34B, Broad Green Avenue, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 2ST
LON/00AH/LSC/2021/0333 · service charges · Croydon · decided 22 Jun 2022
The county court and tribunal dismissed the freeholder's claim for unpaid service charges and insurance because the demands did not contain the required s.21B statement, and dismissed the leaseholder's damages counterclaim for lack of proven loss.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £8,682.31 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
an end of terrace house converted into three flats
- years
for the period 06/2014 –
- outcome
The claim is dismissed with no order for costs.
- total demanded
in the sum of £8,682.31
- s20
no consultation under s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 took place
- costs
The claim is dismissed with no order for costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.