347 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BJ
LON/00AG/LSC/2024/0219 · service charges · Camden · decided 23 Dec 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided the leaseholder must pay for the internal radiators, pipework and associated works for the communal heating replacement, with the landlord entitled to choose their design and location, and the estimated cost of £3,327.24 found reasonable; the section 20C application was refused.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 529 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
situated on an estate of 529 flats, known as the Weedington Estate
- years
the year ending March 2023 which in total was £7,813.29, and the year ending March 2024 which in total was £11,285.85
- s20c
the applications under section 20C and paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 are refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.