34 Oaklands Road Pennfields Wolverhampton WV3 0DS

BIR/00CW/LSC/2025/0014 · service charges · Wolverhampton · decided 2 Dec 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal struck out the tenant's challenge to a concierge service charge because it found the charge was a fixed rather than variable service charge, so it had no jurisdiction to decide it.

Outcome	Dismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Other
Freeholder / landlord	Midland Heart Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	2011
Items in dispute	other
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Midland Heart Ltd
years: relates to service charge years 2011/12 to date
outcome: The application is struck out for lack of jurisdiction
s20c: We decline to make the orders requested under these provisions

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.