34 Cranley Gardens, London SW7 3DD
LON/00AW/LDC/2020/0104 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 19 Oct 2020
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof gutter repair works at 34 Cranley Gardens because they posed a clear risk to public safety.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Welcome Trust Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 9 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The premises consist of 9 flats in a Mansion Block.
- agent
Representative : [name] (UK) Ltd
- years
The invoice for the works (see Exhibit 4) was submitted on 27.07.20.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that those parts of the consultation requirements provided for by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 ("the Act") which have not been complied with are to be dispensed with.
- s20
it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements in respect of the installation of the roof repair works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.