33 Normanton Road, South Croydon, Surrey, CR2 7AE
LON/00AH/LUS/2022/0001 · LUS · Croydon · decided 2 Nov 2022
The tribunal decided that the respondent freeholder must repay £3,615.89 of accrued uncommitted service charges to the RTM company, because it could not prove that the challenged October 2021 costs were incurred.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, management fees, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Total demanded | £4,931.58 |
| Total found payable | £3,615.89 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Ltd
- years
The relevant service charge year for the block is 29 September 2021 to 28 September 2022.
- outcome
The resultant figure is £3,615.89, which is repayable by the respondent to the applicant.
- items reduced
the amount of the challenged costs claimed which the respondent, because of its lack of evidence, could not prove it had incurred during that period
- total demanded
Total £4,931.58
- total payable
The resultant figure is £3,615.89, which is repayable by the respondent to the applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.