33 Belsize Park, London NW3 4DX
LON/00AC/LDC/2022/0213 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 17 Jan 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for additional roof works to the block carried out while scaffolding was up, with no tenant objection and no order on fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 33 Belsize Park Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a residential block of seven flats on two or three floors.
- freeholder
Applicant : 33 Belsize Park Limited
- agent
Representative : Warwick Estates ([name])
- outcome
The Tribunal grants a dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works the subject of the application.
- s20
The Tribunal grants a dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works the subject of the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.