33 Balcombe Court, Balcombe Road, BN10 7QW
CHI/21UF/LAC/2023/0017 · administration charges · Lewes · decided 4 Jun 2025
The tribunal found the landlord had not proven that the tenant breached the lease by altering the kitchen wall, so no administration charges are payable, and it made a section 20C order and ordered the landlord to reimburse the tenant's application and hearing fees.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Balcombe Court Peacehaven Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant to reimburse the respondent's application fee and hearing fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Balcombe Court Peacehaven Limited would be the Applicant
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that no administration charges are payable by the Respondent tenant
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that no administration charges are payable by the Respondent tenant
- s20c
makes an Order under Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 section 20 C
- costs
Tribunal makes an Order for the reimbursement of the Respondent tenant’s application fee and the hearing fees.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.