32A Belgrave Road Aylesbury, Bucks HP19 9HN
CAM/11UB/LLD/2019/0001 · LLD · Buckinghamshire · decided 23 Aug 2019
The tribunal found the landlord's public liability insurance charge of £168.86 and the buildings insurance charge of £86 not reasonable or payable by the leaseholder, ordered the £100 application fee repaid, and barred the landlord from recovering its costs of the proceedings through the service charge.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairfield Rents Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Urbanpoint Property Management Ltd. |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the applicant the application fee of £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
small post war block of six maisonettes
- freeholder
Respondent : Fairfield Rents Ltd. (Landlord)
- agent
Urbanpoint Property Management Ltd. this company is in fact the agent for the landlord
- years
Both items are now identified by the applicant as ones falling within service charge ending 2019.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £168.86 for ‘Public Liability Insurance’ is not reasonable and payable by the applicant.
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that the sum of £86 for the ‘Insurance’ is not reasonable and payable by the applicant.
- s20c
the landlord is not to seek recover any of their costs arising from the proceedings in respect of this application to the Tribunal
- costs
The Tribunal determines that the application fee of £100 is repaid to the applicant by the respondent.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.