32 Bridge Court, Lea Bridge Road, London E10 7JS

LON/00BH/LAC/2019/0019 · administration charges · Waltham Forest · decided 11 Feb 2020

The tribunal found the leaseholder liable to pay only £300 of about £22,170 in administration charges, because most of the solicitors', counsel's and agents' costs of the county court claim were not reasonable or recoverable under the lease.

Outcome	Substantially reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Triplerose Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat · 3 decisions about this building
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	administration charges, legal and professional fees, other
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges, legal and professional fees, other
Total demanded	£22,170.24
Total found payable	£300
Fees or costs ordered	fees of £108 to be reimbursed by the applicant

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Triplerose Ltd
outcome: Out of the administration charges totalling £22,170.241 challenged
items reduced: In the Tribunal’s opinion, none of these costs are reasonable
total demanded: Out of the administration charges totalling £22,170.241 challenged
total payable: £300.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.