32 Barnsbury Road, London N1 OHD: LON00AU/LDC/2020/0098
LON/00AU/LDC/2020/0098 · dispensation from consultation · Islington · decided 28 Sep 2020
The tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof and front wall repairs at 32 Barnsbury Road, but made no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | BPT (Bradford Property Trust) |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Edessa Finance Limited |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
divided into 4 self- contained flats
- freeholder
(2( BPT (Bradford Property Trust)
- agent
Edessa Finance Limited Managing agent for the premises
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to the roof work and the damage to the wall
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to the roof work and the damage to the wall at the premises known as 32 Barnsbury Road.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.