32 - 34 Richmond Road, Kingston, KT2 5ED
LON/00AX/LDC/2025/0747 · dispensation from consultation · Kingston upon Thames · decided 4 Aug 2025
The Tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the Section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the automatic opening vent system at this building, but did not decide whether the resulting costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HML PM Limited |
| Building | A block, 30 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a 2007 purpose-built development containing 30 flats
- agent
HML PM Limited applied on behalf of the Applicant on 22 May 2025
- outcome
The Tribunal determines to grant the application.
- s20
The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements provided by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.