311 HIGH STREET, ORPINGTON, BR6 0NN
LON/00AF/LDC/2023/0246 · dispensation from consultation · Bromley · decided 4 Dec 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent remedial works to render and electrics required by a dangerous structure notice at 311 High Street, Orpington.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tzedokoh Vechesed Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 19 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
19 residential flats on the second to fourth floors
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold owner of a building known as and situate at 311 High Street
- outcome
The tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the consultation required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the consultation required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.