31 The Woodlands Beulah Hill Upper Norwood London SE19 3EQ
LON/00AH/LLC/2024/0601 · LLC · Croydon · decided 9 Dec 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the respondent's legal costs of £8,396.00 arising from the section 146 forfeiture notice and related proceedings are not payable by the leaseholder, and made orders preventing the landlord's costs of this application being added to the service charge or sought from the leaseholder.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £8,396 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | costs of £8,396 against the a party |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondents : The Woodlands Beulah Hill Limited
- outcome
the tribunal determines the costs of £8,369.60 are not payable by the applicant to the respondent.
- items reduced
the tribunal determines the costs of £8,369.60 are not payable by the applicant to the respondent.
- total demanded
The tribunal finds the legal costs sought by the respondent in the sum of £8,396.00 are not payable by the applicant
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 2985 so that none of the respondent’s costs of or arising from this application can be added to the service charges.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.