31 Park Grange Mount, Sheffield S2 3SP
MAN/00CG/LSC/2018/0029 · service charges · Sheffield · decided 18 Apr 2019
The tribunal found that administration costs of £803.50 incurred by the landlord in recovering unpaid service charges for 2016 and 2017 were reasonable and payable by the leaseholders, because they failed to notify a change of address properly.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Gleeson Developments (North East) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Mainstay Residential Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 125 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £803.50 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] (North East) Ltd
- agent
Representative : Mainstay Residential Ltd
- years
the two service charge years 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017 are payable
- outcome
administration charges totalling £803.50 were reasonably incurred and are payable by the Respondents
- total payable
Administration costs totalling £803.50 following failure by the Respondents to pay the service charge due
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.