31-38 Cavendish Gardens, Trouville Road, London SW4 8QW
LON/00AY/LDC/2025/0851 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 11 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord Phasemake Limited dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent structural scaffolding props at the block, as no leaseholder objections were received.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Phasemake Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | GH Property Management |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a mid-terrace block of eight flats over four floors.
- freeholder
Applicant : Phasemake Limited
- agent
Representative : GH Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements provided by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- s20
The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements provided by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.