31-33 Monmouth Road, London W2 4UT

LON/00BK/LDC/2026/0031 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 29 Apr 2026

The tribunal granted the applicant unconditional retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of deteriorating carpet, as no leaseholder objected or showed prejudice.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation granted
Who applied	RTM company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Warwick Estates
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent: Hayden Scott of Warwick Estates,
years: carpet was deteriorating and potentially mouldy in July
outcome: The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.
s20: The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.