31-117 Trafalgar Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire GL7 2EL
CHI/23UC/LDC/2020/0027 · dispensation from consultation · Cotswold · decided 10 Jun 2020
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for proposed works to install a warden call system, door entry system and upgrade the fire detection system, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Places for People Homes Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Ltd |
| Building | A block, 87 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
shared between the 87 leaseholders
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] for People Homes Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works to install a new warden call system, door entry system and upgrade of the fire detection system
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.