302-340 Medina House, Silbury Boulevard, Milton Keynes, MK9 2FA
CAM/00MG/LSC/2025/0652 · service charges · Milton Keynes · decided 12 Feb 2026
The tribunal found that service charge demands dated 7 March 2022, 31 August 2022 and 6 March 2023 are not currently due because they did not name the landlord as required by section 47 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, while demands from 31 August 2023 onwards are payable to Assethold Limited, with the leaseholders' section 20C and fee-refund applications to be decided later on written submissions.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 86 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Medina House is a converted former office block of 86 leasehold flats
- freeholder
For Assethold Limited, Mr [name], Counsel
- years
(i) 2021 - 2022
- outcome
(1) The tribunal determines that the service charge demands dated 7
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 1 May 2026.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.