30 Vicarage Road, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 4ED
LON/00BD/LDC/2023/0039 · dispensation from consultation · Richmond upon Thames · decided 24 Apr 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency roof repair works, while leaving open any later challenge to their reasonableness and cost.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which now contain five leasehold flats situated across three storeys
- freeholder
The applicant is the freeholder of the Property, acting by its managing agent, Together Property Management Ltd.
- agent
acting by its managing agent, Together Property Management Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.