Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BH4 8EG

30 Robert Louis Stevenson Avenue, Westbourne, BH4 8EG

HAV/00HQ/LDC/2026/0034 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 14 Aug 2026

The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repair works, making no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordSouthern Land Securities Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentTogether Property Management
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Limited
agent
Representative : Together Property Management
outcome
The Applicant is granted retrospective dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
the Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to grant retrospective dispensation from the consultation requirements under Section 20 of the 1985 Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.