30 Lindfield Gardens, Guildford, GU1 1TS
CHI/43UD/LIS/2022/0002 · LIS · Guildford · decided 18 Mar 2022
The tribunal found the respondent not liable to pay the on-account service charge demands of £3,543.25 because the lease did not allow payments on account, but found the balcony major works and the year ended 28 September 2020 costs reasonably incurred, payable subject to a new demand, and the £706 administration charges not payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, major works, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | £3,543.25 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 24 units
- outcome
The Respondent is not liable to pay the sum of £3,543.25 in respect of on account service charges demanded on 23 September 2019, 4 October 2019, 19 November 2019 and 10 March 2020.
- items reduced
The Respondent is not liable to pay the administration charges totalling of £706.00
- total demanded
Total £3,543.25
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.