30 Atheldene Road SW18 3BW
LON/00AG/LDC/2025/0639 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 14 May 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to repair water ingress at the property, leaving any question of reasonableness and payability to be considered separately under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd |
| Management company | Together Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
on behalf of, the freeholder, Southern Land Securities Ltd.
- agent
Together Property Management Ltd
- outcome
unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines that unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.