30-32 Thames Street, Kingston - Upon - Thames, Surrey, KT1 1PE
LON/00AX/LSC/2019/0227 · service charges · Kingston upon Thames · decided 20 Nov 2019
The tribunal ordered the landlord to refund £300 to the leaseholders within 28 days, found £8,300 payable for 2019/2020 estimated service charges, and made a section 20C order so the landlord cannot pass its tribunal costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Casares Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Landswood de Coy LLP |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £8,300 |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse the applicants £300 within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Casares Properties Limited
- agent
Landswood de Coy LLP
- years
the estimated service charges for the year 2019/2020
- outcome
The Respondent shall pay to the Applicants the sum of £300
- total payable
the sum of £8,300.00 is payable by the Applicants
- s20c
An order is made under section 20C of the 1985 Act so that the Respondent may not pass
- costs
The Respondent shall pay to the Applicants the sum of £300
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.