30-31 Devonshire Place, London, W1G 6JJ
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0158 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 6 Sep 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of corroded plumbing, gas and electrical works in the building's vaults, while stating that reasonableness of the works and costs was outside the scope of the application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Howard De Walden Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant Howard De Walden Estates Limited
- years
The works took place between 12 April and 28 May 2021.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to the plumbing, gas and electrical works in the vaults of the building.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.