3 Pride Lodge, Lion Yard, High Street, Buckden, Cambridshire, PE19 5XA
CAM/12UE/LIS/2018/0021 · LIS · Huntingdonshire · decided 16 Nov 2018
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found most of the claimed service charges not payable or only partly payable, because the landlord had not complied with the 18-month rule and the demands lacked required information, and it ordered that the landlord cannot recover the representation costs through future service charges.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
for the period 25th December 2013 to 24th December 2017
- outcome
the determination of this Tribunal is that £160.28 is payable
- items reduced
It includes increases of over 60% for management
- total payable
1,009.73
- s20c
orders pursuant to section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.