3 Langley Manor, 29 Bucknall Way, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 3XX
LON/00AF/LSC/2021/0182 · service charges · Bromley · decided 13 Jan 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's challenge to the electricity and legal and professional fee charges, finding the fees reasonably incurred, and made a partial s.20C order limiting the landlord to recovering 50% of its tribunal costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no refund of application fee to applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
for the years 2015 to 2021
- outcome
The Application is dismissed.
- s20c
The s.20C application is granted to the extent the Respondent shall not
- costs
the tribunal does not order the Respondent to refund any fees paid by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.