Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W4 3TG

3 Bolton Lodge, London W4 3TG

LON/00AT/LAM/2025/0032 · appointment of a manager · Hounslow · decided 15 Oct 2026

The Tribunal refused the Applicant's application to appoint a manager for the block, finding no basis that it would be just and convenient given the recent new arrangement with all lessees becoming directors, and refused the section 20C and paragraph 5A cost orders.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordLong Bolt Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentUniq Block Management Ltd
BuildingOne flat, 8 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, utilities, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a purpose-built block of 8 flats constructed in
freeholder
Respondent : Long Bolt Ltd
agent
Uniq Block Management Ltd (“Uniq”)
outcome
The Applicant’s applications to appoint a manager under section 24 of the
s20c
the Tribunal is not satisfied that it would be just or equitable to make either order and so these applications are refused too.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.