3 & 6 Lenwood Country Club, Lenwood Road, Northam, Bideford, EX39 3PN
CHI/18UK/LSC/2020/0131 · service charges · Torridge · decided 8 Apr 2021
The tribunal found the 2016/17 insurance demand was paid twice and is refundable through the County Court, nil was payable for the 2016/17 and 2019/20 insurance years, and the 2020/21 insurance payment on account was set at £150 per leaseholder instead of £241.63.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ground Rent Trading Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Moreland Estate |
| Building | An estate, 66 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | £522.87 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of at least 66 chalet/ bungalows
- freeholder
Respondent : Ground Rent Trading Limited
- agent
the Respondent's managing agent, Moreland Estate
- years
Insurance 2019/2020
- outcome
the Tribunal determines that a reasonable amount payable towards the insurance premium for 2020/2021 by each leaseholder is £150.
- items reduced
the Tribunal determines that a reasonable amount payable towards the insurance premium for 2020/2021 by each leaseholder is £150.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.