2A-D Spring Court, Crookes, SHEFFIELD, S10 1GJ 91A-F Spring Court, School Road, Crookes, SHEFFIELD, S10 1GJ Ainsley Court, Ainsley Road, Crookes, SHEFFIELD, S10 1EU
MAN/00CG/LDC/2025/0636 · dispensation from consultation · Sheffield · decided 20 Mar 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent fire safety works (interlinked smoke detectors and a waking watch) carried out in December 2024 across the three blocks, finding it reasonable given the urgent safety need.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ainsley Court Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Ainsley Court Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Trinity (Estates) Property Management Ltd |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Ainsley Court Management Company Limited
- agent
Trinity (Estates) Property Management Ltd, is the management
- outcome
Pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the Tribunal grants
- s20
Pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the Tribunal grants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.