29 Maryvale Court, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS14 9HZ
· other · Lichfield · decided 7 May 2020
The tribunal found the 2019-20 service charge demand of £1,647.48 reasonable and payable, including the sinking fund transfer, but found the additional 5% administration charge on the roof works not justified, and made a s.20C order protecting leaseholders from the costs of these proceedings.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sanctuary Housing Association |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £1,647.48 |
| Total found payable | £1,647.48 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of four flats situated in Boley Lodge
- freeholder
The freehold is held by the Respondent.
- years
The Service charge demand for 2019-20 in the sum of £1647.48 is reasonable and payable.
- outcome
The Service charge demand for 2019-20 in the sum of £1647.48 is reasonable and payable.
- items reduced
the Tribunal is not satisfied that the administration/management charge additional to the actual cost of work is reasonable
- total demanded
Total £ 1,647.48
- total payable
The Service charge demand for 2019-20 in the sum of £1647.48 is reasonable and payable.
- s20c
The cost of these proceedings may be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of service charge payable by the Applicant pursuant to s20C
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.