29 Brandhall Court, Wolverhampton Road, Oldbury, B68 8DE
BIR/00CS/LIS/2021/0030 · LIS · Sandwell · decided 13 Apr 2022
The tribunal found that a £725 repair cost and a £2,196.60 arrears write-off for another flat were not payable through the service charge by this leaseholder, limited his contribution to roofing works to £250 because the section 20 consultation requirements were not complied with, and found the integrated reception system costs reasonable and payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Brandhall Court Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Brandhall Court Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 40 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Development comprises 40 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Brandhall Court Management Company
- years
service charge periods 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2021
- outcome
are limited to £250.00.
- items reduced
the sum of £725.00 is not a maintenance expense payable under the terms of the Lease
- s20
as the consultation requirements were not complied with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.