286 Ladbroke Grove, Notting Hill, London, W10 5LP
LON/00AW/LDC/2025/0618 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 15 Apr 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the external masonry at 286 Ladbroke Grove because falling debris posed a risk of injury, and no leaseholder objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Freehold Management (Traders) Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management Ltd. |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,740 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which has been converted into 3 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Freehold Management (Traders) Ltd.
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of repair works to the external masonry
- total demanded
The total cost of the works was £1,740.
- s20
the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of repair works to the external masonry
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.