28 LANCASTER COURT, AUCKLEY, DONCASTER DN9 3PZ
MAN/00CE/LSC/2021/0090 · service charges · Doncaster · decided 5 Jul 2022
The tribunal found the service charges as demanded by ACIS GROUP LIMITED payable and ordered that its costs of the application cannot be added to the service charge account.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's contractual liability to indemnify the respondent's costs reduced to nil |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
one of 6 two bedroomed flats laid out over three floors in a purpose built block (Block D)
- years
service charges payable in the years ending 31 March 2020, 2021 and 2022
- outcome
Service charges payable by the Applicant are as demanded by the Respondent.
- s20c
The Respondent’s costs of the application may not be added to the service charge
- costs
any such liability is reduced to nil
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.