27 Rotherfield Avenue, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, TN40 1SY
CHI/21UG/LIS/2019/0014 · LIS · Rother · decided 14 Jun 2019
The tribunal found the service charges of £7085.00 and £586.77 payable, found the £333.49 insurance charge payable only once the expenditure is certified and a statement of account supplied, and found the £363.25 administration charges not payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, major works, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £8,005.26 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been converted into two flats with the Respondents on the ground floor and the Applicant on the first floor
- years
The sum of £586.77, being the service charge claimed for year ending 5 April 2017.
- outcome
The administration charges claimed in the sum of £363.25 are not payable by the Respondents.
- items reduced
The administration charges claimed in the sum of £363.25 are not payable by the Respondents.
- total demanded
claiming arrears of service charges in the sum of £8005.26
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.