27 Rivan Court, 143 Inverness Terrace, London, W2 6JA
LON/00BK/LSC/2022/0051 · service charges · Westminster · decided 9 May 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the 2017 charge of £2,340 for water damage repairs unreasonable and not payable by the leaseholder, ordered the respondent to refund the £100 application fee, and made a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Preside Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £2,340 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee of £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
addressed to the respondent’s then property manager Preside Property Management
- years
These charges were added to the applicant’s service charge account in 2017
- outcome
the service charge for the item listed above is consequently unreasonable and therefore not payable by the applicant
- items reduced
the service charge for the item listed above is consequently unreasonable and therefore not payable by the applicant
- total demanded
giving the total claimed of £2340
- s20c
100% of the costs incurred by the respondent in connection with these proceedings should not be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant
- costs
there be an order for the refund of the applicant’s application fee in the sum of £100
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.