27 Quercetum Close, Aylesbury, HP19 8JN
CAM/11UB/LIS/2020/0002 · LIS · Buckinghamshire · decided 14 Apr 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the 2016/17 to 2018/19 service charges payable in reduced amounts, with a small cut to the ground rent collection fee and a £200 reduction in the 2018/19 interim charge, disallowed both the £300 and £250 administration charges, and made a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Abbey Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Crabtree Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, management fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £574.53 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
1. Abbey Developments Limited
- management company
Holmans Place Management Limited as the management company (the Company)
- agent
Crabtree Property Management and
- years
the service charge years 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/9
- outcome
In the circumstances the tribunal allows £24, inclusive of Vat, double the minimum amount stated in the agreement.
- items reduced
(4) The tribunal determines that neither administration charge of £300 or £250 are payable by the applicant;
- s20c
The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, preventing the respondent from passing on the costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.