27 Eaton Park Road, London N13 4ED
LON/00AK/LSC/2023/0347 · service charges · Enfield · decided 14 May 2024
The tribunal ordered the leaseholder to pay £270 towards a surveyor's fee and £100 towards porch repairs, but found the insurance premiums and solicitors' fees were not payable and refused to order reimbursement of the tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a converted house comprising of two flats
- years
service charge years 2020-21 (surveyor’s fee £540), 2021-22 (porch repair £200) and 2022-23 (insurance £932.20)
- outcome
The following sums are payable by the respondent to the applicant:
- items reduced
The tribunal finds the applicant has failed to include the respondent’s name on the insurance schedules for 2021/22 and 2022/2023 as
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.