27 Cadogan Place, London, SW1X 9SA
LON/00AW/LDC/2024/0158 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 12 Aug 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for a management agreement with Sapphire Property Management, but did not decide whether the management fees are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Sapphire Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into six flats
- agent
[name] of Sapphire Property Management applied on behalf of the
- outcome
The tribunal determines to grant the application.
- s20
The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.