27,35,39,40,41,43 Queens Apartments, Robertson Terrace, Hastings, East Sussex TN34 1JN

CHI/21UD/LSC/2018/0060 · service charges · Hastings · decided 14 Jan 2019

The Tribunal found the 2016 to 2018 service charge demands valid and most charges payable, but disallowed the £120 per year bank charge and refused the leaseholder's section 20C application.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	Oakfield Property Management Limited
Building	A block, 6 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2016, 2017, 2018
Items in dispute	administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	other
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent: [name] are the managing agents, not the freeholder.
years: in respect of the service charge years 2016, 2017 and 2018.
outcome: Bank charges of £120 per year per Block are not recoverable.
items reduced: Bank charges of £120 per year per Block are not recoverable.
s20c: The section 20C application is refused.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.