Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SG1 2LT

27-34 Kilby Road, Stevenage, Hertfordhshire, SG1 2LT

CAM/26UN/LPC/2018/0002 · LPC · Stevenage · decided 7 Dec 2018

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the landlord £3,062.16 in costs incurred in response to an unsuccessful right to manage claim, which was withdrawn.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordNotting Hill Genesis Winckworth Sherwood LLP
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeutilities, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant £3,062.16 under s88(4) Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
The decision of the tribunal is that the amount of costs so payable is £3.062.16.
total payable
The decision of the tribunal is that the amount of costs so payable is £3.062.16.
costs
the amount of costs so payable is £3.062.16

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.