26B Curzon Road, Bournemouth BH1 4PN
HAV/00HQ/LSC/2025/0690 · service charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 22 May 2026
The tribunal found the leaseholder liable for the disputed charges for reports, surveys and specifications, but not for the management fees or the cost of section 20 consultation notices, and liable for £960 of pre-action legal costs, with the section 20C application left for written submissions.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Napier Management Services |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, management fees, other |
| Total demanded | £5,208.90 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been converted into two flats
- agent
It appointed Napier Management Services as managing agents.
- years
for the period 25 June 2023–24 September 2023.
- outcome
£150 of charges are not payable, and £181.70 are payable.
- items reduced
£150 of charges are not payable, and £181.70 are payable.
- total demanded
confirmed the disputed sums now totalled £5,208.90
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.