26B and 28A Minet Road, London SW9 9UA
LON/00AY/LSC/2020/0191 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 8 Nov 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the roof replacement, external doors, uPVC window replacement in flat 28B, rainwater goods, external decoration above £6,000 per house, wall works above £6,000 per house and scaffolding above £5,000 per house were not fully recoverable, while the parapet repairs and temporary relocation of dishes were recoverable, and made a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charge year 2018/19
- outcome
The cost of the replacement of the roofs is not recoverable in
- items reduced
The cost of replacement of external doors is not recoverable
- s20c
We order (1) under section 20C of the 1985 Act that the costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.