Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near E14 3QF

26 Shackleton Court London E14 3QF

LON/00BG/LSC/2020/0323 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 30 Jun 2021

The Tribunal found the Respondent liable to pay the Applicant £11,036.06 in outstanding service charges, interest and costs, rejecting his defence that he had not received the letter before action.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordRedrow Homes (South East) Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputeadministration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedother
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payable£11,036.06
Fees or costs orderedRespondent to pay solicitors' costs of £6,182.66 and counsel's fee of £1,250 (total £7,432.66) on indemnity basis reduce

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Redrow Homes (South East) Ltd as freeholder (1)
years
between 12 February 2019 and 1 February 2020
outcome
the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Applicant the sum of £11,036.06
items reduced
The Applicant agreed to apply a credit of £100 to the Respondent’s account
total payable
the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Applicant the sum of £11,036.06
costs
total costs payable by the Respondent of £7,432.66

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.