26 Post Office Square, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN1 1BQ
CHI/29UQ/LSC/2022/0117 · service charges · Tunbridge Wells · decided 1 Jun 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the estimated lift contract, maintenance, electricity and reserve fund charges for the year ending October 2023 payable in full, and declined to make a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Office Square Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 32 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,847 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a building containing 32 flats on an estate known as the Former Head Post Office
- management company
Respondent : Office Square Management Ltd
- years
the year ending October 2023
- outcome
Therefore this amount is payable in full
- total demanded
The total value in dispute is £3,847.
- s20c
I decline to make any orders under Section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.