26 Gambole Road, London , SW17 0QJ
LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0065 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 30 Jul 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for necessary works to the gutter at 26 Gambole Road, leaving leaseholders' rights to challenge costs under sections 19 and 27A unaffected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Densa Lauber 80 Lupus Street RTM Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Limited |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into three flats
- freeholder
the freeholder, [name] 80 Lupus Street RTM Company Ltd dated
- agent
A written Application was made by Residential Mangement Group Limited
- outcome
unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from
- s20
unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.