26 Brunswick Terrace, Hove, East Sussex BN3 1HJ
CHI/00ML/LDC/2022/0106 · dispensation from consultation · Brighton and Hove · decided 19 Jan 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for lift repairs, subject to obtaining competitive quotations, and made no decision on whether any service charge costs are payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 26 Brunswick Terrace Hove (Freehold) Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Deacon Crickmay Asset Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : 26 [name] Terrace Hove (Freehold)
- agent
Representative : Deacon Crickmay Asset Management
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of lift repairs.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of lift repairs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.