26 Barry Road, East Dulwich, London SE22 0HU
LON/00BE/LDC/2024/0217 · dispensation from consultation · Southwark · decided 26 Nov 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing the front entrance step at a cost of £825.00, noting the application may no longer be needed.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block, 4 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £825 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into four long leasehold flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Limited
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management
- outcome
the tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from consultation pursuant to
- total demanded
replacement and fitting of the front step to the communal front entrance by Glynn Building Services at a cost of £825.00
- s20
the tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from consultation pursuant to
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.