25 York House, North Drive, Hatfield Herts AL9 5EG

CAM/26UL/LIS/2020/0004 · LIS · Welwyn Hatfield · decided 10 Aug 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal reduced the reserve fund demand to £350 per half year plus a £399 pump contribution, found the respondent liable for £666 of administration charges and costs, rejected the £840 contractual costs and the counterclaim, and dismissed the applicant's claim for costs.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	RG Securities (No.2) Limited
Managing agent	Warwick Estates
Building	One flat, 37 flats · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in dispute	2019
Items in dispute	administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	administration charges, legal and professional fees, reserve fund
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to pay nothing towards the applicant's costs; the applicant's claim for costs dismissed

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: There are 37 flats in the development
management company: Applicant/Claimant : RG Securities (No.2) Limited
agent: Representative : PDC Law and Ms [name] of Warwick Estates
years: the second period in 2019 the sum of £1,151.37
outcome: That should be reduced to £749 being £350 for the reserved fund and £399 for the contribution towards the pump costs.
items reduced: I find that she has no liability in respect of the fixed legal costs of £840, nor the costs I was asked to assess at the hearing.
costs: I dismiss the applicant’s claim for costs in the proceedings for which a summary assessment was sought.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.