Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TR13 8PT

25 Wendron Street, Helston, Cornwall,TR13 8PT

CHI/00HE/LDC/2022/0037 · dispensation from consultation · Cornwall · decided 27 Jun 2022

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency repairs to a mains water supply pipe at the property, finding no prejudice to the lessees.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCoastline Housing Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 2 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a purpose built block of two flats
freeholder
Applicant : Coastline Housing Ltd
outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the emergency works to the mains water supply pipe.
s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the emergency works to the mains water supply pipe.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.