25 Market Place, Falloden Way, London, NW11 6JY
LON/00AC/LDC/2019/0008 · dispensation from consultation · Barnet · decided 13 Mar 2019
The tribunal refused the landlord's application to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements for roof works, finding the leaseholders would be prejudiced, but made a section 20C order so the landlord's costs of the dispensation application cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Crescent Trustees Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of two residential two bedroom flats above a commercial unit
- freeholder
Applicant : Crescent Trustees Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal declines to grant the application for the dispensation of
- s20c
A section 20C order is made on the terms set out below
- s20
The Tribunal declines to grant the application for the dispensation of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.